It was never a fad
Two and a half decades of continuous development by a large, open community is a different risk profile from a CMS backed by one venture-funded company that could pivot or shut down.
Drupal Hub · History
This isn't trivia for a pub quiz. Drupal's history explains why it behaves the way it does today — why the "painful upgrade" reputation is a decade out of date, why the security team takes disclosure seriously, and why institutions keep betting a decade of content on a platform that started as one student's side project.
Dries Buytaert, a student in Belgium, built an internal message board to keep in touch with housemates. When their internet connection moved to a permanent line, he put the board online — and in 2001 open-sourced it under the name Drupal, from the Dutch word 'druppel' (drop).
Early Drupal grew as a volunteer-driven open-source project — a modular architecture (core plus contributed modules) let it flex from personal blogs to community sites. That contributor model, not a single vendor's roadmap, is still the core of how Drupal is built today.
Buytaert co-founded Acquia to offer enterprise hosting, support and tooling around Drupal — giving large organisations the vendor accountability procurement processes expect, without changing Drupal's open-source licensing underneath.
Drupal 7 shipped and went on to become the most widely deployed version in Drupal's history, powering a huge share of government, education and enterprise sites for the following decade. Its longevity is exactly why so many of those sites are still running it in 2026, well past its supported life.
Drupal 8 was a ground-up rebuild on Symfony components, moving to modern object-oriented PHP, a built-in web-services layer for headless/decoupled delivery, and multilingual support in core rather than as an add-on. It was the platform's biggest technical shift and set the direction every later release builds on.
Drupal 9 changed the upgrade model itself: rather than another ground-up rewrite, it shipped by removing deprecated code and updating dependencies, so sites already current on Drupal 8 could move forward with comparatively little disruption. This is the model every release has followed since.
Drupal 10 and 11 continued the same pattern — updated front-end tooling (Olivero and Claro as default themes), a modernised administration experience, and ongoing performance and authoring improvements — arriving on a predictable cadence rather than a disruptive relaunch.
Drupal 7's official support ended in January 2025. New vulnerabilities discovered against it are published to the world but never patched for it — a standing invitation to anyone scanning the internet for easy targets, and the single biggest reason the migration conversation is urgent.
A large, still-active installed base of Drupal 7 sites remains online across government and enterprise, at the same time regulators (Saudi NCA, PDPL) are tightening what they'll accept. The gap between 'still running' and 'still supported' is exactly where breaches and audit findings happen.
drupal-history-timeline.jpgTwo and a half decades of continuous development by a large, open community is a different risk profile from a CMS backed by one venture-funded company that could pivot or shut down.
The disruptive Drupal 7-to-8 jump is often cited as a reason to distrust Drupal upgrades — but that was a one-time architectural transition. Every release since 9 has been an incremental, well-tolerated upgrade.
Multilingual support, headless/decoupled delivery and a proper web-services layer are core Drupal since 2015, not modules retrofitted onto a platform designed for something simpler.
Acquia and a network of certified partners (VOX GCC among them) provide the support layer large procurement processes want, while the underlying platform stays open source and portable.
Every Drupal vulnerability is disclosed publicly and tracked openly — uncomfortable in the moment, but it means you're never relying on a vendor's word that 'everything's fine.' You can check for yourself, and so can your auditors.
Understanding where Drupal came from is only half the picture. See why that history translates into concrete enterprise adoption in the Gulf onwhy enterprises and governments choose Drupal, browsecase studiesfor how a migration off an old version actually runs, or jump straight to theDrupal FAQ.
Dries Buytaert created what became Drupal around 2000 and open-sourced it in 2001. It remains one of the most actively maintained open-source CMS platforms in the world, developed by a large global community and supported commercially through companies like Acquia and certified partners including VOX GCC.
Drupal 7 predated the 2015 architectural rewrite in Drupal 8, and its scale of adoption across government and enterprise made the community extend its support window repeatedly. That long run is exactly why so many institutional sites are still on it — and why the end-of-life in January 2025 left such a large installed base exposed.
No, and this is one of the most persistent myths holding organisations back. That was a one-time architectural rewrite. Every release since Drupal 9 has followed an incremental model — deprecated code removed, dependencies updated, no repeat of the 2015 disruption.
A platform's history tells you about its risk profile: is it maintained by one company that could change direction, or by a broad community with a track record of adapting (open-source licensing, headless delivery, continuous upgrades) rather than stagnating? Drupal's history answers that question in its favour for institutions planning a decade-long platform investment.
Tell us your URL and we'll tell you straight — including a clear, costed migration read within one business day.
Speak to a specialist
Share your goal — more leads, a new platform, a market entry — and a senior consultant will come back within one business day with a clear point of view on how to get there. No obligation, no sales script.
Prefer email?hello@voxgcc.com